Moderate Physical Activity Reduces the Odds of Sarcopenia in Community- dwelling Older Women: A Cross-sectional Study.

INTRODUCTION: The time spent in different physical activity (PA) intensities is associated with sarcopenia risk for community-dwelling older women. AIM: To evaluate the role of sitting time and physical activity (PA) level as predictors of sarcopenia odds. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, physically independent older women (n = 67) performed the six-minute walk test to identify functional limitation (≤ 400 m). Sedentary time (as sitting time) and PA (light, moderate and vigorous) were obtained with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Sarcopenia was diagnosed as recommended by the Society of Sarcopenia, Cachexia and Wasting Disorders (SCWD). Sarcopenia odds (low muscle mass and functional limitation) was predicted by binary logistic regression, considering the weekly sitting time and PA as independent variables. RESULTS: Sarcopenia prevalence was 7.5% (n = 5), with functional limitation present in 38.8% (n = 26), and low muscle mass in 22.4% (n = 15). The predictive model (p = 0.014) involved moderate PA as the only significant predictor (OR = 0.999; p = 0.005; 95% CI: 0.998-1.000) of functional limitation. Moderate PA prevents sarcopenia odds. Each weekly hour of moderate PA decreased sarcopenia odds by 6%. CONCLUSION: Time spent in moderate PA can prevent sarcopenia.

Normalizing calf circumference to identify low skeletal muscle mass in older women: a cross-sectional study / Normalización de la circunferencia de la pantorrilla para identificar la masa muscular esquelética baja en las mujeres mayores: un estudio transversal

Introduction: functional limitation is a result of sarcopenia and is associated with loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM). Cost-effective methods are important for the identification of sarcopenia. Objective: to propose cutoff points for normalized calf circumference (CC) in order to identify low SMM in older women based on their functional limitation.Methods: in this descriptive, cross-sectional study the CC values of a young female sample (n = 78) were used to establish cutoff points (-2 SD) for low SMM in older women (n = 67). Functional limitation was identified by the six-minute walk test (≤ 400 m). CC was normalized by body mass, height, and BMI. The diagnostic accuracy of CC was calculated with a ROC curve, using functional limitation as standard. Results: cutoff points and area under the curve (AUC) were: CC (≤ 28.5; 0.62); CC·body mass-1 (≤ 0.40; 0.63); CC·height-2 (≤ 8.52; 0.55) and CC·BMI-1 (≤ 1.10; 0.73). Only CC·BMI-1 achieved a desirable accuracy (AUC > 0.7) to distinguish functional limitation. Conclusion: the accuracy attained supports the use of CC·BMI-1 to identify low SMM in older women. In the clinical context it is possible to predict the risk of sarcopenia when sophisticated methods for determining SMM are not available. (AU)

Introducción: la limitación funcional es consecuencia de la sarcopenia y se asocia con la pérdida de masa muscular esquelética (MME). Los métodos rentables son importantes para la identificación de la sarcopenia. Objetivo: proponer puntos de corte para la circunferencia de la pantorrilla (CP), normalizada para identificar un MME bajo en mujeres mayores en función de su limitación funcional. Métodos: en este estudio descriptivo de carácter transversal se utilizaron los valores de CP de una muestra de mujeres jóvenes (n = 78) para establecer los puntos de corte (-2 DS) de la MME baja en las mujeres mayores (n = 67). La limitación funcional se identificó mediante la prueba de la marcha de seis minutos (≤ 400 m). La CP se normalizó por la masa corporal, la altura y el IMC. La precisión diagnóstica de la CP se calculó con la curva ROC, utilizando como estándar la limitación funcional. Resultados: los puntos de corte y el área bajo la curva (AUC) fueron: CP (≤ 28,5; 0,62); CP·masa corporal-1 (≤ 0,40; 0,63); CP·altura-2 (≤ 8,52; 0,55) y CP·IMC-1 (≤ 1,10; 0,73). Solo el CP·IMC-1 logró la precisión deseable (AUC > 0,7) para distinguir la limitación funcional. Conclusión: la precisión alcanzada respalda el uso de CP·IMC-1 para identificar la MME baja en las mujeres mayores. En el contexto clínico es posible predecir el riesgo de sarcopenia cuando no se dispone de métodos sofisticados para determinar la MME. (AU)

Normalizing calf circumference to identify low skeletal muscle mass in older women: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: functional limitation is a result of sarcopenia and is associated with loss of skeletal muscle mass (SMM). Cost-effective methods are important for the identification of sarcopenia. Objective: to propose cutoff points for normalized calf circumference (CC) in order to identify low SMM in older women based on their functional limitation. Methods: in this descriptive, cross-sectional study the CC values of a young female sample (n = 78) were used to establish cutoff points (-2 SD) for low SMM in older women (n = 67). Functional limitation was identified by the six-minute walk test (≤ 400 m). CC was normalized by body mass, height, and BMI. The diagnostic accuracy of CC was calculated with a ROC curve, using functional limitation as standard. Results: cutoff points and area under the curve (AUC) were: CC (≤ 28.5; 0.62); CC·body mass-1 (≤ 0.40; 0.63); CC·height-2 (≤ 8.52; 0.55) and CC·BMI-1 (≤ 1.10; 0.73). Only CC·BMI-1 achieved a desirable accuracy (AUC > 0.7) to distinguish functional limitation. Conclusion: the accuracy attained supports the use of CC·BMI-1 to identify low SMM in older women. In the clinical context it is possible to predict the risk of sarcopenia when sophisticated methods for determining SMM are not available.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la limitación funcional es consecuencia de la sarcopenia y se asocia con la pérdida de masa muscular esquelética (MME). Los métodos rentables son importantes para la identificación de la sarcopenia. Objetivo: proponer puntos de corte para la circunferencia de la pantorrilla (CP), normalizada para identificar un MME bajo en mujeres mayores en función de su limitación funcional. Métodos: en este estudio descriptivo de carácter transversal se utilizaron los valores de CP de una muestra de mujeres jóvenes (n = 78) para establecer los puntos de corte (-2 DS) de la MME baja en las mujeres mayores (n = 67). La limitación funcional se identificó mediante la prueba de la marcha de seis minutos (≤ 400 m). La CP se normalizó por la masa corporal, la altura y el IMC. La precisión diagnóstica de la CP se calculó con la curva ROC, utilizando como estándar la limitación funcional. Resultados: los puntos de corte y el área bajo la curva (AUC) fueron: CP (≤ 28,5; 0,62); CP·masa corporal-1 (≤ 0,40; 0,63); CP·altura-2 (≤ 8,52; 0,55) y CP·IMC-1 (≤ 1,10; 0,73). Solo el CP·IMC-1 logró la precisión deseable (AUC > 0,7) para distinguir la limitación funcional. Conclusión: la precisión alcanzada respalda el uso de CP·IMC-1 para identificar la MME baja en las mujeres mayores. En el contexto clínico es posible predecir el riesgo de sarcopenia cuando no se dispone de métodos sofisticados para determinar la MME.

Population specificity affects prediction of appendicular lean tissues for diagnosed sarcopenia: a cross-sectional study / La especificidad de la población impacta en la predicción de los tejidos magros apendiculares para la sarcopenia diagnosticada: un estudio transversal

INTRODUCTION: sarcopenia is a disease characterized by reduced musculoskeletal tissue and muscle strength. The estimation of appendicular lean soft tissue by DXA (ALSTDXA) is one of the criteria for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. However, this method is expensive and not readily avaiable in clinical practice. Anthropometric equations are low-cost and able to accurate predict ALST, but such equations have not been validated for male Brazilian older adults between the ages of 60 to 79 years. To this end, this study sought to validate the existing predictive anthropometric equations for ALST, and to verify its accuracy for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in male Brazilian older adults. METHODS: this cross-sectional study recruited and enrolled 25 male older adults (69.3 ± 5.60 years). ALSTDXA and anthropometric measures were determined. ALST estimations with 13 equations were compared to ALSTDXA. The validity of the equations was established when: p > 0.05 (paired t-test); standard error of the estimate (SEE) < 3.5 kg; and coefficient of determination r² > 0.70. RESULTS: two Indian equations met the criteria (Kulkarini 1: 22.19 ± 3.41 kg; p = 0.134; r² = 0.78; EPE = 1.3 kg. Kulkarini 3: 22.14 ± 3.52 kg; p = 0.135; r² = 0.82; SEE = 1.2 kg). However, these equations presented an average bias (Bland-Altman: 0.54 and 0.48 kg) and 'false negative' classification for the ALST index. Thus, three explanatory equations were developed. The most accurate equation demonstrated a high level of agreement (r2 adj = 0.87) and validity (r²PRESS = 0.83), a low predictive error (SEEPRESS = 1.53 kg), and an adequate ALST classification. CONCLUSION: anthropometric models for predicting ALST are valid alternatives for the diagnosis and monitoring of sarcopenia in older adults; however, population specificity affects predictive validity, with risks of false positive/negative misclassification

INTRODUCCIÓN: la sarcopenia es una enfermedad caracterizada por una reducción del tejido musculoesquelético y la fuerza muscular. Uno de los criterios utilizados para su diagnóstico es la determinación de tejido blando magro apendicular por DXA (TBMADXA), método costoso que no siempre está disponible en la práctica clínica. Las ecuaciones antropométricas suponen un bajo coste y predicen bien el TBMA, pero con una validez desconocida para los varones brasileños de 60 a 79 años. Por lo tanto, nuestro objetivo fue validar las ecuaciones antropométricas existentes predictivas del TBMA y verificar su precisión para el diagnóstico de sarcopenia en varones brasileños de edad avanzada. MÉTODOS: participaron en este estudio transversal 25 hombres de edad avanzada (69,3 ± 5,60 años). Se determinaron el TBMADXA y las medidas antropométricas. Las ecuaciones predictivas del TBMA se compararon con el TBMADXA. La validez de las ecuaciones en las comparaciones se confirmó cuando: p > 0,05 (prueba de la "t" pareada); error estándar estimado (EEE) < 3,5 kg; coeficiente de determinación r² > 0,70. RESULTADOS: dos ecuaciones indias cumplieron los criterios (Kulkarini 1: 22,19 ± 3,41 kg; p = 0,134; r² = 0,78; EEE = 1,3 kg. Kulkarini 3: 22,14 ± 3,52 kg; p = 0,135; r² = 0,82; EEE = 1,2 kg). Sin embargo, presentaron sesgo promedio (Bland-Altman: 0,54 y 0,48 kg) y clasificación de 'falso negativo' para el índice de TBMA. Por lo tanto, se crearon tres ecuaciones explicativas. La ecuación más precisa mostró un alto acuerdo (r2 adj = 0,87), uma alta validez (r²PRESS = 0,83), um bajo error predictivo (EEEPRESS = 1,53 kg) y uma clasificación del TBMA adecuada. CONCLUSIÓN: los modelos antropométricos para predecir el TBMA son alternativas válidas para el diagnóstico y el seguimiento de la sarcopenia en los ancianos. Pero la especificidad de la población afecta a su validez predictiva, con riesgos de incorrección por clasificación falsa positiva/negativa

Population specificity affects prediction of appendicular lean tissues for diagnosed sarcopenia: a cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: the estimation of appendicular lean soft tissue by DXA (ALSTDXA) is one of the criteria for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. However, this method is expensive and not readily avaiable in clinical practice. Anthropometric equations are low-cost and able to accurate predict ALST, but such equations have not been validated for male Brazilian older adults between the ages of 60 to 79 years. To this end, this study sought to validate the existing predictive anthropometric equations for ALST, and to verify its accuracy for the diagnosis of sarcopenia in male Brazilian older adults. Methods: this cross-sectional study recruited and enrolled 25 male older adults (69.3 ± 5.60 years). ALSTDXA and anthropometric measures were determined. ALST estimations with 13 equations were compared to ALSTDXA. The validity of the equations was established when: p > 0.05 (paired t-test); standard error of the estimate (SEE) < 3.5 kg; and coefficient of determination r² > 0.70. Results: two Indian equations met the criteria (Kulkarini 1: 22.19 ± 3.41 kg; p = 0.134; r² = 0.78; EPE = 1.3 kg. Kulkarini 3: 22.14 ± 3.52 kg; p = 0.135; r² = 0.82; SEE = 1.2 kg). However, these equations presented an average bias (Bland-Altman: 0.54 and 0.48 kg) and 'false negative' classification for the ALST index. Thus, three explanatory equations were developed. The most accurate equation demonstrated a high level of agreement (r2adj = 0.87) and validity (r²PRESS = 0.83), a low predictive error (SEEPRESS = 1.53 kg), and an adequate ALST classification. Conclusion: anthropometric models for predicting ALST are valid alternatives for the diagnosis and monitoring of sarcopenia in older adults; however, population specificity affects predictive validity, with risks of false positive/negative misclassification.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: uno de los criterios utilizados para el diagnóstico de la sarcopenia es la determinación de tejido blando magro apendicular por DXA (TBMADXA), método costoso que no siempre está disponible en la práctica clínica. Las ecuaciones antropométricas suponen un bajo coste y predicen bien el TBMA, pero con una validez desconocida para los varones brasileños de 60 a 79 años. Por lo tanto, nuestro objetivo fue validar las ecuaciones antropométricas existentes predictivas del TBMA y verificar su precisión para el diagnóstico de sarcopenia en varones brasileños de edad avanzada. Métodos: participaron en este estudio transversal 25 hombres de edad avanzada (69,3 ± 5,60 años). Se determinaron el TBMADXA y las medidas antropométricas. Las ecuaciones predictivas del TBMA se compararon con el TBMADXA. La validez de las ecuaciones en las comparaciones se confirmó cuando: p > 0,05 (prueba de la "t" pareada); error estándar estimado (EEE) < 3,5 kg; coeficiente de determinación r² > 0,70. Resultados: dos ecuaciones indias cumplieron los criterios (Kulkarini 1: 22,19 ± 3,41 kg; p = 0,134; r² = 0,78; EEE = 1,3 kg. Kulkarini 3: 22,14 ± 3,52 kg; p = 0,135; r² = 0,82; EEE = 1,2 kg). Sin embargo, presentaron sesgo promedio (Bland-Altman: 0,54 y 0,48 kg) y clasificación de 'falso negativo' para el índice de TBMA. Por lo tanto, se crearon tres ecuaciones explicativas. La ecuación más precisa mostró un alto acuerdo (r2adj = 0,87), uma alta validez (r²PRESS = 0,83), um bajo error predictivo (EEEPRESS = 1,53 kg) y uma clasificación del TBMA adecuada. Conclusión: los modelos antropométricos para predecir el TBMA son alternativas válidas para el diagnóstico y el seguimiento de la sarcopenia en los ancianos. Pero la especificidad de la población afecta a su validez predictiva, con riesgos de incorrección por clasificación falsa positiva/negativa.

Cut-off points of knee extension strength allometrically adjusted to identify sarcopenia risk in older adults: A cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Handgrip strength used to identify sarcopenia is not representative of overall strength, especially as greater muscle volume and consequent autonomy-mobility are concentrated in the lower limbs. While absolute strength or relative to body mass is used to define sarcopenia, this relationship is not always linear. The aim of this study was to establish allometrically adjusted cut-off points of lower limb (quadriceps) muscle strength to identify sarcopenia risk in older adults. METHODS: ninety-four physically independent individuals over the age of 60 were measured by DXA and sarcopenia was identified. The one-repetition maximum (1RM) test of knee extension strength was estimated using the extensor chair by the submaximal repetition protocol. The six-minute walk test performance was recorded. 1RM values were scaled by body mass (1RM/body mass) and allometrically adjusted (1RM/body massb). Cut-off points for sarcopenia from 1RM were defined with ROC curve and Youden index with functional limitation (walking distance<400 m). Analyzes considered sex (α = 5%). RESULTS: Sarcopenia was present in 10.6 % of participants. The exponents b obtained were 0.70 for women and 0.96 for men. Except for absolute 1RM in women, all areas under the curve were acceptable (>0.70). The cut-off points for women and men were respectively, 38.1 and 56.1 kg for 1RM, 0.53 and 0.85 for 1RM/body mass, 1.48 and 1.00 for 1RM/body massb. CONCLUSIONS: 1RM of knee extension scaled by body mass or allometrically adjusted is an effective parameter to identify sarcopenia in older adults. The proposed cut-off points could be used to monitor sarcopenia risk in geriatrics.